Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Openai pr #469

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Openai pr #469

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

nvucinic
Copy link

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@nvucinic
Copy link
Author

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

CodiumAI-Agent commented Jan 16, 2024

PR Analysis

(review updated until commit 9f84cd7)

  • 🎯 Main theme: Addition of OpenAI to the technology stack and modification of the NGINX_PORT in the docker-compose file.
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces two changes. The first one is the addition of OpenAI to the list of technologies used in the README.md file. The second change is the modification of the NGINX_PORT from 80 to 8080 in the docker-compose.yml file.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 1, because the changes are straightforward and do not involve complex code modifications.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The changes made in this PR are clear and concise. However, it would be beneficial to provide more context or explanation about the addition of OpenAI in the README.md file. For instance, how it is being used or why it was added to the project.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant fileREADME.md
suggestion      

Consider adding a brief description or a link to more information about OpenAI, to provide more context to readers. [medium]

relevant line- OpenAI

relevant filedocker-compose.yml
suggestion      

Ensure that the change of the NGINX_PORT from 80 to 8080 does not conflict with other services that might be running on port 8080. [important]

relevant line- NGINX_PORT=8080


✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the code feedback section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section

The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions.
If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results.
Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ As solving the above issue requires addition of various vulnerabilities, hence i
- Spring Boot
- ReactJS
- Javascript/TypeScript
- OpenAI

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be helpful to provide a brief description or a link to OpenAI's documentation next to the OpenAI technology addition. This would help unfamiliar readers understand what OpenAI is and how it is used in this project. [medium]

@@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ services:
- "80:80"
environment:
- NGINX_HOST=foobar.com
- NGINX_PORT=80
- NGINX_PORT=8080

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the change of the NGINX_PORT from 80 to 8080 has any implications on other parts of the system or if it requires certain conditions to work properly, it would be beneficial to document this in a comment next to the changed line. [medium]

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

Persistent review updated to latest commit 9f84cd7

@nvucinic nvucinic closed this Jan 16, 2024
@nvucinic nvucinic deleted the openai-pr branch January 16, 2024 08:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants